On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:54:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still
> quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
> What do you think?
It's at least an order of magnitude more complicated (=error-prone) than the
Le mercredi 21 février 2007 12:54, Frank Küster a écrit :
> To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still
> quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
Not that I don't see any solution, but I would prefer to correct this
situation with the forthcoming 1
Le jeudi 8 février 2007 22:17, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > I think the bug #388616 should be granted this etc-ignore. The
> > configuration file is never shiped with the package nor generated by the
> > software. It is generated in config/ directory, and happen normaly only
> > at first install.
>
Le jeudi 8 février 2007 15:22, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> Le jeudi 8 février 2007 03:03, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> > > Under the circumstances, I would be willing to grant an etch-ignore
> > > exception for the file location. If the location of the file is still
> > > causing upgrade errors (wh
4 matches
Mail list logo
