Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread George Danchev
reassign 388518 lablgtk2 retitle LablGTK2 is known to crash with some Qt GTK2 rendering engines severity 388518 wishlist thanks On Thursday 21 September 2006 13:56, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:42:54PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > On Thursday 21 September 2006 12:29, Moh

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread Mohammed Sameer
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:42:54PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 21 September 2006 12:29, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:02:04PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > > I forgot to mention that since that segfault is not reproducible here, it > > > would be useful to

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 21 September 2006 12:29, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:02:04PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > I forgot to mention that since that segfault is not reproducible here, it > > would be useful to know how the old versons of ara perform at yor side: > > > > svn co svn:

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 21 September 2006 12:29, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:02:04PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > I forgot to mention that since that segfault is not reproducible here, it > > would be useful to know how the old versons of ara perform at yor side: > > > > svn co svn:

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread Mohammed Sameer
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:02:04PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > I forgot to mention that since that segfault is not reproducible here, it > would be useful to know how the old versons of ara perform at yor side: > > svn co svn://svn.debian.org/ara/tags/1.0.13 > svn co svn://svn.debian.org/ara/t

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 21 September 2006 12:25, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:46:37AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > On Thursday 21 September 2006 11:13, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > > Thanks for your response ;-) > > > > --cut-- > > > > > Do you want to recompile with debugging support

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread Mohammed Sameer
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:46:37AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 21 September 2006 11:13, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > Thanks for your response ;-) > --cut-- > > Do you want to recompile with debugging support and run more tests ? > > Just please note that I don't know ocaml! > > Yes, I

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread George Danchev
I forgot to mention that since that segfault is not reproducible here, it would be useful to know how the old versons of ara perform at yor side: svn co svn://svn.debian.org/ara/tags/1.0.13 svn co svn://svn.debian.org/ara/tags/1.0.14 as well as the current trunk: svn co svn://svn.debian.org/ara/

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 21 September 2006 11:13, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > Thanks for your response ;-) --cut-- > Do you want to recompile with debugging support and run more tests ? > Just please note that I don't know ocaml! Yes, I'd appreciate if you do the following: $apt-get install ocaml-nox (in order t

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-21 Thread Mohammed Sameer
Thanks for your response ;-) On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:06:25AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 21 September 2006 01:13, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xara > > Segmentation fault > > > > I think we should display an error and exit instead of segfaulting ? > > You are

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-20 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 21 September 2006 01:13, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xara > Segmentation fault > > I think we should display an error and exit instead of segfaulting ? You are certainly right and thanks for reporting that. We shouldn't segfaulting here ;-) May I have your assistance

Bug#388518: xara-gtk: segfault if run with normal user.

2006-09-20 Thread Mohammed Sameer
Package: xara-gtk Version: 1.0.15 Severity: normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xara Segmentation fault I think we should display an error and exit instead of segfaulting ? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (