Bug#386972: Bug#387025: Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-21 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 20:34 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:27:53PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > forwarded 386972 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7159 > > thanks > > thanks for the pointer. > > > Seems the message below never went out, likely because

Bug#387025: Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:27:53PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > forwarded 386972 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7159 > thanks thanks for the pointer. > Seems the message below never went out, likely because the SMTP server > at work refused to forward a message from @debian.org.

Bug#386972: Bug#387025: Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
forwarded 386972 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7159 thanks Seems the message below never went out, likely because the SMTP server at work refused to forward a message from @debian.org. Sorry about the delay. As it turns out, booting with "acpi=off" solves this network problem. Is th

Bug#387025: Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:14:14 +0200 maximilian attems wrote: > ahh i love your constructive interaction in bug reports. Thanks for the compliment :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.s

Bug#387025: Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-13 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:52:38PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:11:23 +0200 maximilian attems wrote: > > > we don't support 2.6.16 anymore, no need to play around, > > thus remerging the bugs. > > please be so kind to provide upstream bug report as follow up > > If no l

Bug#386972: Bug#387025: Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:11:23 +0200 maximilian attems wrote: > we don't support 2.6.16 anymore, no need to play around, > thus remerging the bugs. > please be so kind to provide upstream bug report as follow up If no longer supported, then the correct thing to do is either to abandon the package (

Bug#387025: Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-13 Thread maximilian attems
forcemerge 387025 386972 stop and no thanks On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:37:39PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > unmerge 386972 > reassign 386972 linux-2.6.16 > tags 386972 -moreinfo > tags 387025 -moreinfo > thanks > > Given that this bug is in both 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 packages in the > archive, I'

Bug#387025: Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-13 Thread Adam C Powell IV
unmerge 386972 reassign 386972 linux-2.6.16 tags 386972 -moreinfo tags 387025 -moreinfo thanks On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 00:57 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:41:24PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > As for moreinfo, I provided it, didn't I? What more is needed, su

Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:41:24PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > As for moreinfo, I provided it, didn't I? What more is needed, such > that you added it back? > > -Adam asked for the irq but meant ioports please provide cat /proc/ioports also if you can verify that 2.6.18-rc5, see trunk s

Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 20:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > tags 386972 moreinfo > reassign 386972 linux-2.6 > reassign 387025 linux-2.6 > merge 386972 387025 > thanks > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:07:07PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Sorry about the inappropriate severity. (Not sure what yo

Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-11 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 386972 moreinfo reassign 386972 linux-2.6 reassign 387025 linux-2.6 merge 386972 387025 thanks On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:07:07PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Sorry about the inappropriate severity. (Not sure what you mean by > "escalate" but will use important in the future.) > Cloning

Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 386972 -moreinfo clone 386972 -1 reassign -1 linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 retitle -1 Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.17 thanks [Sorry about the duplicate, forgot to copy the bug and control.] On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 15:02 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > severity 386972 important > tags 386972

Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-11 Thread maximilian attems
severity 386972 important tags 386972 moreinfo stop On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 07:50:14AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp > Version: 2.6.16-18 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes debilitating loss of functionality an DD should no not to escalate severity,

Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16

2006-09-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp Version: 2.6.16-18 Severity: grave Justification: causes debilitating loss of functionality Greetings, I just upgraded a machine from sarge to etch, and in the process upgraded from 2.6.8 to 2.6.16. When I rebooted, and on multiple reboots since, the network