On Feb 5, 2008 4:35 PM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, would the following change break anything?
> --- configure.orig 2008-01-25 10:55:34.0 +0100
> +++ configure 2008-01-25 10:56:14.0 +0100
> @@ -4345,7 +4345,7 @@
> test "$svn_all
Just out of curiosity, would the following change break anything?
--- configure.orig 2008-01-25 10:55:34.0 +0100
+++ configure 2008-01-25 10:56:14.0 +0100
@@ -4345,7 +4345,7 @@
test "$svn_allowed_neon" = "any"; then
svn_allowed_neon_on_system="yes"
[Peter Samuelson]
> Yeah, well ... the --la-file option itself is a poor interface. The
> very existence of a ".la file" should be a libtool implementation
> detail that libraries and applications never need to know about. They
> should be asking "what do I add to my link line to link to neon", n
[C. Michael Pilato]
> I'm pretty confident that when you removed the .la file from the
> package, you should have also caused 'neon-config --la-file' to stop
> claiming that callers could find the .la file for neon in a place it
> no longer resides.
Yeah, well ... the --la-file option itself is a
I don't know whether or not it's Correct to remove the .la file from the
neon package (though I strongly suspect not).
However, I'm pretty confident that when you removed the .la file from the
package, you should have also caused 'neon-config --la-file' to stop
claiming that callers could find the
5 matches
Mail list logo
