Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 09:06:28PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do > > the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability. > > Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more impor

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Mike Hommey
> yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do > the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability. Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more important problems than that. And I'm not uploading every other day. Plus, there are much less

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 385793 thanks Mike Hommey writes: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > reopen 385793 > > > severity 385793 important > > > thanks > > > > > >

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reopen 385793 > severity 385793 important > thanks > > > Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work done on java > > build in this release makes them unnecessary. > > sorry, no. what you do here

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 385793 severity 385793 important thanks > Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work done on java > build in this release makes them unnecessary. sorry, no. what you do here is to avoid the uninstallability for one case (which however still exists), but the original problem

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:13:40PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 12:31:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mike Hommey writes: > > > > a new release. Feel free to NMU to relax the dependencies (removi

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Mike Hommey writes: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 12:31:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Mike Hommey writes: > > > a new release. Feel free to NMU to relax the dependencies (removing the > > > superior limit should be enough and safe) > > > > done, patch attached. > > This

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 12:31:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > a new release. Feel free to NMU to relax the dependencies (removing the > > superior limit should be enough and safe) > > done, patch attached. This won't solve your problem, since arm h

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Mike Hommey writes: > a new release. Feel free to NMU to relax the dependencies (removing the > superior limit should be enough and safe) done, patch attached. diff -u xulrunner-1.8.0.5/debian/control xulrunner-1.8.0.5/debian/control --- xulrunner-1.8.0.5/debian/control +++ xulrunner-1.8.0.5/debi

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 11:24:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:27AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Mike Hommey writes: > > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:21:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 11:24:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:27AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Mike Hommey writes: > > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:21:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:27AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:21:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: xulrunner > > > Version: 1.8.0.5-3 > > > > > > With every upload, the libmozjs-dev,

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Mike Hommey writes: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:21:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Package: xulrunner > > Version: 1.8.0.5-3 > > > > With every upload, the libmozjs-dev, libnspr4-dev, libnss3-dev > > packages become uninstallable until the package has been rebuilt on

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:13:14AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:21:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: xulrunner > > > Version: 1.8.0.5-3 > > > > > > With every upload, the libmozjs-dev,

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Mike Hommey writes: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:21:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Package: xulrunner > > Version: 1.8.0.5-3 > > > > With every upload, the libmozjs-dev, libnspr4-dev, libnss3-dev > > packages become uninstallable until the package has been rebuilt on

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:21:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: xulrunner > Version: 1.8.0.5-3 > > With every upload, the libmozjs-dev, libnspr4-dev, libnss3-dev > packages become uninstallable until the package has been rebuilt on > all architectures. Please consi

Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: xulrunner Version: 1.8.0.5-3 With every upload, the libmozjs-dev, libnspr4-dev, libnss3-dev packages become uninstallable until the package has been rebuilt on all architectures. Please consider changes these to architecture any, this saves developer's and buildd admin time to look at th