Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
This bug needs to be reevaluated since it's quite old and the other
parts involved (including dpkg and apt) must have changed
significantly in these 7 years.
I am not sure if this situation of "Package is in a very bad
inconsistent state - you should reinstall it befo
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:03:53PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> [..]
> > Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
> > Writing extended state information... Done
> > Reading package fields... Done
> > Reading package status... Done
> > Retrievi
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
[..]
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
> Writing extended state information... Done
> Reading package fields... Done
> Reading package status... Done
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Dialog
> de
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 07:25:07AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:25:52PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
> > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:50:22PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 07:41:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PR
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:25:52PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:50:22PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 07:41:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > was heard to say:
> > > So the second line has overwritte
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:50:22PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 07:41:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
> > In
> > vector &states = PackageOps[pkg];
> > pkg = 0, and is of type char *. It is created by this code further
> > up; note the
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 07:41:42PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> In
>vector &states = PackageOps[pkg];
> pkg = 0, and is of type char *. It is created by this code further
> up; note the comments in the original:
>
>
>
In
vector &states = PackageOps[pkg];
pkg = 0, and is of type char *. It is created by this code further
up; note the comments in the original:
/* dpkg sends strings like this:
'status: : '
errors look like this:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 05:43:43PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
...
> If it's not too much trouble, I wonder if I could suggest that you
> build a debug apt too? I believe you can do this by fetching the source
> and running "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt,nostrip dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot"
> in the
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Here's the stack trace, which seems to indicate something going wrong
> in libc (or the kernel?), with libstdc++ possibly adding another layer
> of error on top of that.
>
> I don't know if the low-level
Here's the stack trace, which seems to indicate something going wrong
in libc (or the kernel?), with libstdc++ possibly adding another layer
of error on top of that.
I don't know if the low-level exception is considered normal enough
that it should be caught and dealt with. An excerpt from the gd
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:07:19PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Hmm, while tring to install the build dependencies for aptitude I got
> the same message, though I used apt-get:
>
> corn:~# apt-get -q build-dep aptitude
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency
Hmm, while tring to install the build dependencies for aptitude I got
the same message, though I used apt-get:
corn:~# apt-get -q build-dep aptitude
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
preview-latex-style texlive texlive-context texlive-do
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 12:51:06PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 12:17:52PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:15:27AM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > was heard to say:
> > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:18:57A
I don't suppose the user whose system was affected can get this to
happen in a debug build and get a backtrace? (looks like it's already
fixed :( )
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:20:11PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:21:00PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
> > Package: aptitude
> > Version: 0.4.2-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Severity note: the system experiencing this problem is currently
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:21:00PM -0700, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.4.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Severity note: the system experiencing this problem is currently
> unable to install or upgrade any packages (at least with aptitude).
> This e
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: normal
Severity note: the system experiencing this problem is currently
unable to install or upgrade any packages (at least with aptitude).
This error arose in connection with that problem, and this error may
have contributed to the problem. So the bug
18 matches
Mail list logo
