On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:04:09PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> We will have possibility to discuss those question in the next few
> days with upstream. I would be happy if we could come up with a simple
> libgdal1-dev package in a few, now that 1.4 is in preparation...
> I think we have
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 02:34:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:27:48PM -0400, Steve Halasz wrote:
> > Does anyone have a response to Steve Langasek's query below?
>
> > The history of the gdal package naming decision is here:
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/piperma
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:27:48PM -0400, Steve Halasz wrote:
> Does anyone have a response to Steve Langasek's query below?
> The history of the gdal package naming decision is here:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-general/2005-December/001462.html
> http://lists.alioth.debia
Does anyone have a response to Steve Langasek's query below?
The history of the gdal package naming decision is here:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-general/2005-December/001462.html
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-general/2005-December/001498.html
http://lis
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:29:50PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> The source package cannot be rebuild, too:
> # apt-get build-dep qgis
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Package libgdal1-1.3.1-dev is not available, but is referred to by
> another package.
> This
Package: qgis
Version: 0.7.4-4.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install qgis
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situa
6 matches
Mail list logo
