--- Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since these packages aren't in debian and won't become ready for debian in
> the etch timeframe (if it will be possible to get them into a releasable
> state for etch+1 remains to be seen [1]), the debian BTS is probably not
> the best pla
Hi
On Saturday 02 September 2006 18:32, you wrote:
> --- Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Nadim Shaikli [2006-09-01 17:05]:
> > > Package: freenx
> >
> > This package doesn't appear to be in Debian. Do you know where you
> > obtained it from? What does
> > dpkg -p freenx | g
--- Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Nadim Shaikli [2006-09-01 17:05]:
> > Package: freenx
>
> This package doesn't appear to be in Debian. Do you know where you
> obtained it from? What does
> dpkg -p freenx | grep Maintainer
> say?
It notes the following info - Stefan Lippe
* Nadim Shaikli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-01 17:05]:
> Package: freenx
This package doesn't appear to be in Debian. Do you know where you
obtained it from? What does
dpkg -p freenx | grep Maintainer
say?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Package: freenx
Version: 0.4.4+0.4.5-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
My NXClient starts, authenticates, talks to the remote freenx and seems
to have gone through all the necessary steps yet I didn't get connected
and got timed-out or "lost connection" errors [1] (the NXClient doesn't
start a new w
5 matches
Mail list logo