On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:57:00PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> jup, is on my (quite large) todo list. though I prefere to work on the
> RC issues first, that's why it's not yet done.
>
> we should get nvidia-* really done now. may I have a look at what you
> have right now?
The current release
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Well perhaps documentation on what exactly the calling syntax is, what
> the nevironment is and such would be helpful.
jup, is on my (quite large) todo list. though I prefere to work on the
RC issues first, that's why it's not yet done.
> I managed to get the nvidia driv
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Kel Modderman wrote:
>> other than
>> it not conforming to the standard kbuild invocation as it would if it were
>> aiming for mainline Linux exclusion.
>
> it is a (not yet written) policy that each module-source package needs
> to work like this in order get into linux-mo
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:38:42AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> it is a (not yet written) policy that each module-source package needs
> to work like this in order get into linux-modules-*.
>
> why/what is it so difficult to add/adjust the toplevel makefile to do that?
Well perhaps documentatio
On Friday 20 June 2008 18:38:42 Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Kel Modderman wrote:
> > other than
> > it not conforming to the standard kbuild invocation as it would if it were
> > aiming for mainline Linux exclusion.
>
> it is a (not yet written) policy that each module-source package needs
> to work l
Kel Modderman wrote:
> other than
> it not conforming to the standard kbuild invocation as it would if it were
> aiming for mainline Linux exclusion.
it is a (not yet written) policy that each module-source package needs
to work like this in order get into linux-modules-*.
why/what is it so diffi
On Friday 20 June 2008 16:12:09 Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Kel Modderman wrote:
> > ndiswrapper has been integrated into a forked linux-modules-extra-2.6
> > source package[0], and I found that a custom rules override is required
> > for successful building of ndiswrapper in that framework.
>
> Pleas
Kel Modderman wrote:
> ndiswrapper has been integrated into a forked linux-modules-extra-2.6
> source package[0], and I found that a custom rules override is required
> for successful building of ndiswrapper in that framework.
Please don't override rules, please fix your module-source package
inst
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #385553
ndiswrapper has been integrated into a forked linux-modules-extra-2.6
source package[0], and I found that a custom rules override is required
for successful building of ndiswrapper in that framework.
[0]
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/rep
9 matches
Mail list logo
