Hi!
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 20:33 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> reopen 384802
> thanks
>
> On Sep 22, SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not exactly.
> > If you use only the syslog(3) function, you are right, but if you open a
> > connection to syslog with openlog(3) in the begining of you
reopen 384802
thanks
On Sep 22, SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I do not understand. Datagram sockets are connectionless, and our
> > default syslog daemon appears to cope with them.
> Not exactly.
> If you use only the syslog(3) function, you are right, but if you open a
> connectio
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 23:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> I do not understand. Datagram sockets are connectionless, and our
> default syslog daemon appears to cope with them.
Not exactly.
If you use only the syslog(3) function, you are right, but if you open a
connection to syslog with open
On Sep 20, SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main problem with unix-dgram is that syslog-ng cannot keep the
> connection between reloads. And there are programs (for example some
> part of sendmail) which doesn't connect again. So you loose log messages
> from various parts of the sys
4 matches
Mail list logo
