I've decided that I'll try to put FoF in debian without songs. It has an
embedded editor so that should be no problem for main. Any suggestions?
Miry
2007/2/13, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
>> The explanation Miriam had seems rather odd---if the
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
The explanation Miriam had seems rather odd---if they copyright holders
agree to licence them the agency which was linked to should have nothing
to do with it. OTOH, if they are using songs which aren't original by
them, there could be a problem.
What ex
2007/2/12, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's OK for me if you want to take care about that, thanks a lot :)
Do you want me to send a message to Sami Kyöstilä CC'ing you and explaining
him the situation to open the way?
I would appreciate that very much. It would also be helpful if y
Hi Matthew,
2007/2/9, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is in the copying.txt is not the CC-by-2.5, it's a summary which
doesn't contain all the problematic clauses. There are two options:
either upstream wanted what's in the copying.txt, in which case
debian-legal recommend asking
--- Jason Spiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi Miriam,
>
> The various parts of fretsonfire have various licensing issues, as
> explained below. (Unfortunately my explanation is pretty long.) Is
> it ok if I discuss relicensing with upstream (I will CC the Debian
> BTS) or do you prefer to
Hi Jason, I've also been looking at this, I posted a couple of times to
debian-legal for advice.
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
I am not sure about the miscellaneous data. I assume the authors
wanted to license it under the full Creative Commons Attribution 2.5
license legal code[3] wh
Hi Miriam,
The various parts of fretsonfire have various licensing issues, as
explained below. (Unfortunately my explanation is pretty long.) Is
it ok if I discuss relicensing with upstream (I will CC the Debian
BTS) or do you prefer to do it? Cheers, --Jason
== The current licensing situati
--- Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I've updated the debian/rules to use install -m so that everything is
> the right mode and it builds a package without lintian warnings now. I
> was looking back over the ITP and it says "Frets On Fire depends on a
> library called amanith that
I've updated the debian/rules to use install -m so that everything is
the right mode and it builds a package without lintian warnings now. I
was looking back over the ITP and it says "Frets On Fire depends on a
library called amanith that is licensed under QPL,
so it's not DFSG-free". The todo/ch
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I'm sorry I cannot add it to SVN yet due to some firewall here :(
Do you want me to do that?
Yes, please! :)
Done, packages/trunk/fretsonfire. I've also set the mergeWithUpstream
property for svn-buildpackage to do its magic.
Please, put me as upl
--- Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
> > I've temporarily placed my current debian/ directory for Frets on Fire at:
> >
> > http://users.alioth.debian.org/~baby-guest/fretsonfire/debian.tgz
>
> New one here: http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/fre
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I've temporarily placed my current debian/ directory for Frets on Fire at:
http://users.alioth.debian.org/~baby-guest/fretsonfire/debian.tgz
New one here: http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/fretsonfire-debian.tar.gz
I've updated a bunch of stuff in the debian
Hi,
I've temporarily placed my current debian/ directory for Frets on Fire at:
http://users.alioth.debian.org/~baby-guest/fretsonfire/debian.tgz
I'm sorry I cannot add it to SVN yet due to some firewall here :(
To get the orig.tar.gz file, which must be re-created because the code must be
fetch
13 matches
Mail list logo
