Bug#383037: better error checking and debug output

2006-08-15 Thread Steve Kemp
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:21:29PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote: > And what about checking the return code of debootstrap(if it has a usable)? It already should detect a failure in the case that debootstrap gives an error result. Just the display of the output was broken. I'm not 100% sure i

Bug#383037: better error checking and debug output

2006-08-15 Thread Henning Sprang
Steve Kemp wrote: > [...] > (I'm going to test this and commit it just now. Either way a fix > is pending.) Cool! And what about checking the return code of debootstrap(if it has a usable)? Would be good to inform the user immediately that debootstrap failed (and maybe hinting him how to get

Bug#383037: better error checking and debug output

2006-08-15 Thread Steve Kemp
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:57:25PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote: > > When trying to find out why a xen-tools run made problems, and the suspected > problem was an error in the debootstrap run (because it was too fast), > I realized that even if debootstrap fails, xen-tools seem to accept it's > re

Bug#383037: better error checking and debug output

2006-08-14 Thread Henning Sprang
Package: xen-tools Version: 2.2-3 Severity: normal When trying to find out why a xen-tools run made problems, and the suspected problem was an error in the debootstrap run (because it was too fast), I realized that even if debootstrap fails, xen-tools seem to accept it's result and go on as if ev