Bug#382327: Please don't consider UNRELEASED an invalid distro

2008-05-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 07:49:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > We have a request to tell lintian to not reject UNRELEASED as a > distribution so that testing packages not yet ready for upload can be > checked with lintian with an expectation of no errors. However, I don't > really want to do this

Bug#382327: Please don't consider UNRELEASED an invalid distro

2006-08-25 Thread Russ Allbery
clone 382327 -1 -2 retitle -1 dput: please check for Distribution: UNRELEASED before upload retitle -2 dupload: please check for Distribution: UNRELEASED before upload reassign -1 dput reassign -2 dupload block 382327 -1 -2 thanks Hello, dput and dupload maintainers, We have a request to tell lin

Bug#382327: Please don't consider UNRELEASED an invalid distro

2006-08-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.21.0141 +0100]: > That sounds like a good idea to me. Should I clone this bug against those > packages? I'd rather see them pick up that check before lintian drops > its. Yes, sounds like a good deal. Clone and block. -- Please do not send

Bug#382327: Please don't consider UNRELEASED an invalid distro

2006-08-20 Thread Russ Allbery
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.19.0549 +0100]: >> I have a sneaking suspicion that if we do recognize it, we'll >> immediately get a request from someone to stop recognizing it >> since they were using lintian to remind themselve

Bug#382327: Please don't consider UNRELEASED an invalid distro

2006-08-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.19.0549 +0100]: > I have a sneaking suspicion that if we do recognize it, we'll > immediately get a request from someone to stop recognizing it > since they were using lintian to remind themselves to change the > distribution before uploading.

Bug#382327: Please don't consider UNRELEASED an invalid distro

2006-08-18 Thread Russ Allbery
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: lintian > Version: 1.23.22 > Severity: wishlist > E: mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file > UNRELEASED > I think it would be better not to flag this as an error. UNRELEASED is a > commonly used name in c

Bug#382327: Please don't consider UNRELEASED an invalid distro

2006-08-10 Thread martin f krafft
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.22 Severity: wishlist E: mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file UNRELEASED I think it would be better not to flag this as an error. UNRELEASED is a commonly used name in changelogs during testing and it's refused by dak anyhow. If