> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Girard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 11:04 AM
> To: Harling, Torsten
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#380739: boost compiles differently, if ACE
> header is included first
>
>
Hello Torsten,
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 07:08:39PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> > > Another way of enforcing correct flags would be to check whether symbol
> > > _REENTRANT is defined, and if it is not, the header could abort
> > > compilation with an #error stating _REENTRANT *must* be defined.
>
Hello Torsten,
please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in CC: list so that everything get
archived on the BTS.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:59:43AM +0200, Harling, Torsten wrote:
[...]
> > So, to recap, even though I agree that the order of #include should not
> > change your program behaviour, not defining
tags 380739 + upstream
thanks
Hello Torsten,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Harling, Torsten wrote:
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> using namespace std;
>
> int main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
> cout << "sizeof (boost::detail::sp_counted_base) == "
> << sizeof (b
Package: libace-dev
Version: 5.4.2.1.0-4
This also relies to package libboost-dev version 1.32.0-6.
Consider the following program boostfirst.cpp:
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
5 matches
Mail list logo
