Cool. Thanks!
Andree
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:14 +0200, Bruno Cornec wrote:
> Andree Leidenfrost said on Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:51:01PM +1000:
>
> > Version 5 is attached. I've reverted to a constant for the escape
> > character. I've also gotten rid of all casts you mentioned. I had to
> > remo
Hi Bruno,
Version 5 is attached. I've reverted to a constant for the escape
character. I've also gotten rid of all casts you mentioned. I had to
remove the 'const' for 'escape_list' in main though, otherwise I'd still
get the warning for 'toesc'. So, once we start the cycle for 2.0.9 would
you be
Andree Leidenfrost said on Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:51:01PM +1000:
> Version 5 is attached. I've reverted to a constant for the escape
> character. I've also gotten rid of all casts you mentioned. I had to
> remove the 'const' for 'escape_list' in main though, otherwise I'd still
> get the warning
Andree Leidenfrost said on Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:54:06PM +1000:
> > That fixes which one is used (and should be LSB/FSH compliant) and allow
> > for some exotic distro to change that conf file only to make it work.
> > Definitively for 3.0.x
>
> I am certainly happy for you to make that design
Salut Bruno,
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 02:41 +0200, Bruno Cornec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Andree Leidenfrost said on Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:37:47PM +1000:
>
> > > > To the contrary, e.g. using a function that submits
> > > > things to 'sh -c' means we have a sane environment like a PATH and so
> > > >
Hello,
Andree Leidenfrost said on Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:37:47PM +1000:
> > > To the contrary, e.g. using a function that submits
> > > things to 'sh -c' means we have a sane environment like a PATH and so
> > > forth.
> >
> > Yeah, well ... that depends on whether you can presume the user does
Hi Steven,
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 07:59 -0400, Steven M. Robbins wrote:
> Quoting Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi Steven,
> >
> > Thanks for your response. It appears to me that I have offended you with
> > my last message. Should this be the case, I do apologise, this was not
> >
Quoting Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Steven,
Thanks for your response. It appears to me that I have offended you with
my last message. Should this be the case, I do apologise, this was not
my intention at all.
No, I was not offended. I may have overstated things simply in order
Hi Steven,
Thanks for your response. It appears to me that I have offended you with
my last message. Should this be the case, I do apologise, this was not
my intention at all.
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 19:34 -0400, Steven M. Robbins wrote:
> Quoting Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Ste
Quoting Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Steven, Bruno,
Attached please find a patch and demo program for a new function
mr_stresc() to properly escape strings for use as arguments with (the
likes of) system() and popen().
I have thought about using functions like exec() or fork() to av
Steven, Bruno,
Attached please find a patch and demo program for a new function
mr_stresc() to properly escape strings for use as arguments with (the
likes of) system() and popen().
I have thought about using functions like exec() or fork() to avoid
system() and popen(). I don't really see how th
11 matches
Mail list logo
