On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Not to mention that all databases used by sasl need to be
> > db43_upgrade'd
>
> Yeah, that was clearly a dumb thing of me. I've reverted that part.
>
> FWIW, it did seem to work, but the upgrading clearly need
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Not to mention that all databases used by sasl need to be db43_upgrade'd
> > automatically and safely (backups, and a roolback path), and that cyrus-sasl
> > is linked to glibc nssswitch modules, like e.g. openldap, and will segfault
> > **EVERY** prog
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 06:41:09PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:44:17PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Here is the NMU patch for bugs 336485 and 379846. Sorry, they kind of go
> > > on
> > > top of eac
reopen 336485
stop
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Not to mention that all databases used by sasl need to be
> db43_upgrade'd
Yeah, that was clearly a dumb thing of me. I've reverted that part.
FWIW, it did seem to work, but the upgrading clearly needs more thought
than I should dare to i
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:44:17PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Here is the NMU patch for bugs 336485 and 379846. Sorry, they kind of go
> > on
> > top of each other, but it's easy to figure out.
>
> And what about the objections raised in the
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:44:17PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is the NMU patch for bugs 336485 and 379846. Sorry, they kind of go on
> top of each other, but it's easy to figure out.
And what about the objections raised in the bug log that a simple recompile
with libdb4.3-dev isn't sa
6 matches
Mail list logo
