Paul Bone wrote:
On 27/02/2008, at 5:07 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
As I mentioned yesterday I have a package that is now building with
gcc-4.1 with all of the grades that the current package has.
However, the package still has several issues. One of the biggies is
that it is creating self-
On 27/02/2008, at 5:07 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
As I mentioned yesterday I have a package that is now building with
gcc-4.1 with all of the grades that the current package has.
However, the package still has several issues. One of the biggies
is that it is creating self-recursive symli
ld also be nice not to have another package grab the name. However the
maintainers have the final say on that.
Ray Ward: I'd like to addopt this, may I? If you agree I'll change O
to ITA and make myself the owner on bug #379682.
Absolutely, particularly as my ITA was quite some time a
me to get this one in? If so I'd like it
left in Debian until I'm able to complete this. But since I want to
package the new stable version instead removing it may not affect me.
Ray Ward: I'd like to addopt this, may I? If you agree I'll change O
to ITA and make myself the
Hi Roy Ward,
I'm interested in seeing some up to date Mercury packages in Debian.
Preferably with separate binary packages for the complier and each
supported grade.
How are you going with adoption of this package?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of mercury, Peter Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
has orphaned this package.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly
6 matches
Mail list logo
