Bug#379407: [Pkg-pciutils-discuss] Bug#379407: I/O access on GNU/Hurd

2006-08-01 Thread Martin Mares
> If you apply the attached pciutils-warning.patch, it compiles and then > even works. :-) Eh, that was silly :) Thanks! Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#379407: [Pkg-pciutils-discuss] Bug#379407: I/O access on GNU/Hurd

2006-07-31 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 01:28:39PM +0200, Martin Mares wrote: > > The attached patch is needed to make the pciutils package usable on > > GNU/Hurd systems with the current Debian gnumach kernel packages. > > I've merged the patch and cleaned it up considerably. > > Could you please test t

Bug#379407: [Pkg-pciutils-discuss] Bug#379407: I/O access on GNU/Hurd

2006-07-30 Thread Martin Mares
Hello! > The attached patch is needed to make the pciutils package usable on > GNU/Hurd systems with the current Debian gnumach kernel packages. I've merged the patch and cleaned it up considerably. Could you please test that it still works? (It's in the public GIT tree and also in the 2.2.4-pre

Bug#379407: [Pkg-pciutils-discuss] Bug#379407: I/O access on GNU/Hurd

2006-07-27 Thread Martin Mares
Hello! > I've tried that but the build fails (I attached the log). I also try to > move the #define before other preprocessor directives but that's not > better. I've also try to add the #define within the test case in > lib/i386-ports.c, but that's not sufficient either. So I guess that a > flag