Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 22 July 2006 18:34, you wrote:
>> Yes, and if you ship files in /srv, then your package is creating and
>> insisting upon a particular structure in /srv. Even if the binaries in
>> the package don't insist, the *package* is insisting.
> Yup
Hi,
On Saturday 22 July 2006 18:34, you wrote:
> Yes, and if you ship files in /srv, then your package is creating and
> insisting upon a particular structure in /srv. Even if the binaries in
> the package don't insist, the *package* is insisting.
Yup. That's a structure my package created. Ob
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 22 July 2006 17:35, you wrote:
>> How can that be reconciled with:
>>
>> The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified as
>> there is currently no consensus on how this should be done. One method
>> for struc
Hi,
On Saturday 22 July 2006 17:35, you wrote:
> How can that be reconciled with:
>
> The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified as
> there is currently no consensus on how this should be done. One method
> for structuring data under /srv is by protocol, eg. ftp
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 22 July 2006 02:49, you wrote:
>> By my reading of FHS 2.3, no Debian-supplied package should be
>> installing files into /srv, since /srv is reserved for the local
>> administrator for local data. The error message may not be accurate,
>> b
Hi,
On Saturday 22 July 2006 02:49, you wrote:
> By my reading of FHS 2.3, no Debian-supplied package should be installing
> files into /srv, since /srv is reserved for the local administrator for
> local data. The error message may not be accurate, but it looks to me
> like this still should be
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> package: lintian
> version: 1.23.22
> Hi,
> the new version of policy mandates FHS 2.3, which requires /srv, so this
> is clearly no error :-)
By my reading of FHS 2.3, no Debian-supplied package should be installing
files into /srv, since /srv is res
package: lintian
version: 1.23.22
Hi,
the new version of policy mandates FHS 2.3, which requires /srv, so this is
clearly no error :-)
regards,
Holger
pgpKFlUCvbUSX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
8 matches
Mail list logo
