Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > >> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > So you're saying the only way is to compile, link, and test

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > >> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > So you're saying the only way is to compile, link, and test

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-17 Thread Falk Hueffner
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: >> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So you're saying the only way is to compile, link, and test each of the > 55 source files? Yikes, that's going to take a while. No, y

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We now have about sixteen packages that end up with a segfault or an > > illegal instruction. I haven't tried recompiling all these to verify that > > this is the same problem, but

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-17 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 378599 + moreinfo thanks Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We now have about sixteen packages that end up with a segfault or an > illegal instruction. I haven't tried recompiling all these to verify that > this is the same problem, but I will if it will help. > > The problem i

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-8 Severity: important gcc-4.1 seems to have an optimization problem at -O2 and -O1. If I compile libgc -O2, then one of the tests segfaults. If I compile it -O0 then the self-tests run fine. binutils showed a strange linker error until recompiled with -O0. We now