Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Thanks for your report. Fixes, as described below, will appear in upstream
> > 2.37.
Cool!
> > > results: line dismissed
> > > fix: .B instead of .Fd
> >
> > Not correct; no change. (Is the Debian page different from my upstream,
> > perhaps?)
> Indeed it is:
> http:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 06:10:10PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> tags 378544 fixed-upstream
> thanks
>
> Thomas,
>
> Thanks for your report. Fixes, as described below, will appear in upstream
> 2.37.
>
> > results: line dismissed
> > fix: .B instead of .Fd
>
> Not correct; no change. (Is th
tags 378544 fixed-upstream
thanks
Thomas,
Thanks for your report. Fixes, as described below, will appear in upstream
2.37.
> Here is the list of some problems found with `groff -Tascii -wmac -mman
> $file` and the comments. Most of the problems result in a missing line.
> It sometimes seems to
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18/07/2006):
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> > Here is the list of some problems found with `groff -Tascii -wmac -mman
> Is this any better of a check than lintian's
> manpage-has-errors-from-man?
lintian uses `man -l`, which d
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> Package: manpages
> Version: 2.34-1
> Severity: minor
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the list of some problems found with `groff -Tascii -wmac -mman
Is this any better of a check than lintian's
manpage-has-errors-from-man?
Thanks
Justin
Ref
Package: manpages
Version: 2.34-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
Here is the list of some problems found with `groff -Tascii -wmac -mman
$file` and the comments. Most of the problems result in a missing line.
It sometimes seems to be wanted (macro .nl for example), but would be
better with a known macro (to
6 matches
Mail list logo
