Hey all,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Indeed, that's one nice advantage I didn't think about yet. Let's go
> for this approach. I'll have some time later tonight where I could
> check which changes are required for the scripts and documentation
This was rather st
Hey Lionel,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:03:59PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Etch seems to be still planned for a December release, so uploading it
> would seem a bit risky to me. At this point in time I would upload it
> to sid just after etch release.
I have the same feeling - it's probabl
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 01:57:14PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:02:30PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Was easier than anticipated, at the price of some code duplication.
>> Patch attached.
> How do we best proceed from here? I would be happy to upload
> 2.12r-15 w
Hey Lionel,
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:02:30PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Was easier than anticipated, at the price of some code
> duplication. Patch attached.
Thanks, I have applied the patch to SVN.
How do we best proceed from here? I would be happy to upload
2.12r-15 with the scripts
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:03:25PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> The current svn code (of loopaes-utils) sets the umask
> unconditionally; we decided we preferred to do it only if
> "necessary". Does this mean "a GnuPG key or homedir is copied"? Does
> this mean "root is detected to be on a l
5 matches
Mail list logo
