Bug#378459: Processed: Re: Bug#378459: formencode: exception not catched

2006-07-17 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
> "Fabio" == Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Fabio> I fully agree and will apply the patch with the next upload. Fabio> Thanks for your report, patch and explanation. :) Hey, I have forgotten something in my patch. If the connection is down and there isn't DNS serv

Bug#378459: Processed: Re: Bug#378459: formencode: exception not catched

2006-07-17 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Il giorno dom, 16/07/2006 alle 23.07 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine ha scritto: > It would make sense if the upstream author did it like that in the URL > class (line 1294 in validators.py). In this class, the error exception > is catched and then an Invalid exception is raise with the proper error >

Bug#378459: Processed: Re: Bug#378459: formencode: exception not catched

2006-07-16 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
> "Fabio" == Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Fabio> I'm not sure that an exception Invalid is better then a Fabio> socket.error: all in all, there is a problem with the socket Fabio> and the actual behaviour is quite clear in this sense. It would make sense

Bug#378459: Processed: Re: Bug#378459: formencode: exception not catched

2006-07-16 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Hi Arnaud, thanks for your report! I'm not sure that an exception Invalid is better then a socket.error: all in all, there is a problem with the socket and the actual behaviour is quite clear in this sense. Anyway, you missed to attach the patch! :) What about talking with upstream about this is