Steven M. Christey wrote:
> > Let's forward this to the relevant person at MITRE. Steven, could you
> > please check, whether this might be a duplicate?
>
> Looks like a partial duplicate. CVE-2005-3337 lists two items, and the
> second one appears to be a dupe of CVE-2005-2557 based on the Manti
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Let's forward this to the relevant person at MITRE. Steven, could you
> please check, whether this might be a duplicate?
Looks like a partial duplicate. CVE-2005-3337 lists two items, and the
second one appears to be a dupe of CVE-2005-2557 based
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > mantis
> > CVE-2005-3337 CVE-2006-0664 CVE-2006-0665
> > CVE-2006-0840 CVE-2006-0841 CVE-2006-1577
>
> I've supplied updated packages for sid and sarge, addressing all
> relevant issues. A short breakdown:
Thank you very much!
> CVE-2006-0840 - This was already addres
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
[This is about mantis]
> CVE-2005-3337 - This is a mistery; the description is vague and the
> upstream CVS repository doesn't seem to provide a distinct fix. I
> believe this might actually be a duplicate of another already fixed
> issue, CVE-2005-2557. We really need more
Hello Moritz et al.,
> mantis
> CVE-2005-3337 CVE-2006-0664 CVE-2006-0665
> CVE-2006-0840 CVE-2006-0841 CVE-2006-1577
I've supplied updated packages for sid and sarge, addressing all
relevant issues. A short breakdown:
CVE-2006-1577 - Fixed with upstream patch in sarge and sid;
CVE-2006-0840 - T
Package: mantis
Version: 0.19.2-5sarge2
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hello,
While looking at the mantis security situation for sarge, I discovered
that the following CVE id's have not yet been fixed in sid. I'm not yet
sure of their status so I'm setting this as important now.
CVE-2006-084
6 matches
Mail list logo
