martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.10.1130 +0200]:
. Even if it were, dnsmasq throws away servers with addresses it's
listening on so the 127.0.0.1 entry isn't a problem. To get a server
loop, you should need at least two servers forwarding to each oth
also sprach Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.10.1130 +0200]:
> . Even if it were, dnsmasq throws away servers with addresses it's
> listening on so the 127.0.0.1 entry isn't a problem. To get a server
> loop, you should need at least two servers forwarding to each other.
Ah, okay this i
martin f krafft wrote:
Package: dnsmasq
Severity: normal
Version: 2.22-2
I am getting the following messages:
Jul 9 16:14:05 seamus dnsmasq[23117]: forwarding table overflow:
check for server loops.
Yet my configuration has no loops:
no-resolv
server=213.203.238.4
interface=lo
bi
Package: dnsmasq
Severity: normal
Version: 2.22-2
I am getting the following messages:
Jul 9 16:14:05 seamus dnsmasq[23117]: forwarding table overflow:
check for server loops.
Yet my configuration has no loops:
no-resolv
server=213.203.238.4
interface=lo
bind-interface
and /etc/re
4 matches
Mail list logo