Bug#375688: Bug in iso-codes: iso3166-2.xml contains invalid entries

On Thursday 27 July 2006 09:18, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Hello Tobias, > > shouldn't the changes be reflected in iso_3166_2.tab, too? > They seem to be in the XML file only. Hello, actually, the file iso_3166_2.tab is outdated and should no longer be used. I've therefore removed the file from the

Bug#375688: Bug in iso-codes: iso3166-2.xml contains invalid entries

> thanks for the patch and the additional hints about the ISO 3166-2 XML file. > I've verified that the most part of the patch is indeed correct, except the > code "DE-BR" for Brandenburg. All other corrections have been applied to > the SVN repository and will appear in the next release. Hello

Bug#375688: Bug in iso-codes: iso3166-2.xml contains invalid entries

package iso-codes tag 375688 pending thanks Hello Ulrich, hello Andreas, thanks for the patch and the additional hints about the ISO 3166-2 XML file. I've verified that the most part of the patch is indeed correct, except the code "DE-BR" for Brandenburg. All other corrections have been applied

Bug#375688: Bug in iso-codes: iso3166-2.xml contains invalid entries

Hello, I came across bug #375688 because I had discovered the wrong entry "DE-BR" for Berlin in iso-codes. While I agree that "DE-BR" should be changed to "DE-BE", I believe that the following hunk from the proposed patch is not correct: 1748c1748 < code="DE-BB"name="Brandenbur

Bug#375688: Bug in iso-codes: iso3166-2.xml contains invalid entries

Hello Andreas, I'm sorry for the late reply. We don't use the bug tracking system on Alioth for the iso-codes package, that's why your bug report got lost. I've filed it now on the Debian BTS, see . > i'm looking for a xml-file that contains iso3166-2 entries and