also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.23.1136 +0200]:
> Humm, i don't think it is possible to send a signal on every possible
> case when unison died...
We're not assuming it'll die. I am only talking about
a maintainer-invoked interrupt.
--
Please do not send copies of list
Hello,
martin f krafft writes:
also sprach Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.23.0813 +0200]:
I was thinking that the remote process will finish dying by itself !!!
(SIGPIPE or something similar).
It does not, at least not here. It will continue scanning the
filesystem and die som
also sprach Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.23.0813 +0200]:
> I was thinking that the remote process will finish dying by itself !!!
> (SIGPIPE or something similar).
It does not, at least not here. It will continue scanning the
filesystem and die some time later.
> What about creati
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:11:18AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: unison
> Version: 2.13.16-5
> Severity: normal
>
> the subject says it all...
>
I was thinking that the remote process will finish dying by itself !!!
(SIGPIPE or something similar).
What about creating a sort o
Package: unison
Version: 2.13.16-5
Severity: normal
the subject says it all...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /
5 matches
Mail list logo
