This one time, at band camp, Nicolas François said:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:18:44AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> >
> > The bug is present in 1:4.0.16-2. Unless I'm missing something?
>
> Well, the bug present in 1:4.0.16-2 is a little bit different:
> no mail spools are
package passwd
clone 374705 -1
retitle -1 useradd do not create the mail spool (even with
CREATE_MAIL_SPOOL=yes in /etc/default/useradd)
severity -1 normal
thanks
Hello Stephen,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:18:44AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> The bug is present in 1:4.0.16-2. Unless I'm miss
tags 374705 fixed-upstream
thanks
> Above is return so instead "else" can be placed by only "}".
> OK. I'll ASAP commit neccessary changes.
> Probaly in comming monday will be good release 4.0.17.
OK, so you will release with this fix. If that's completely sure, then
I think that I will not try
This one time, at band camp, Tomasz K??oczko said:
> Dnia 22-06-2006, czw o godzinie 11:18 +0100, Stephen Gran napisa??(a):
> [..]
> > The bug is present in 1:4.0.16-2. Unless I'm missing something?
>
> Please test patch from:
> http://cvs.pld.org.pl/shadow/src/useradd.c?r1=1.97&r2=1.99
[EMAIL P
Dnia 22-06-2006, czw o godzinie 11:18 +0100, Stephen Gran napisał(a):
[..]
> The bug is present in 1:4.0.16-2. Unless I'm missing something?
Please test patch from:
http://cvs.pld.org.pl/shadow/src/useradd.c?r1=1.97&r2=1.99
kloczek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
This one time, at band camp, Christian Perrier said:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:26, you wrote:
> > > However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versions
> > > (according to my tests and according to the code).
> > >
> > > Can somebody else
Dnia 21-06-2006, śro o godzinie 10:55 +0100, Stephen Gran napisał(a):
> --- src/useradd.c~ 2006-06-21 10:51:01.0 +0100
> +++ src/useradd.c 2006-06-21 10:51:17.0 +0100
> @@ -1599,6 +1599,7 @@
> if (fd < 0) {
> perror (_("Creating mai
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:26, you wrote:
> > However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versions
> > (according to my tests and according to the code).
> >
> > Can somebody else confirm?
>
> Confirmed. If I do a new install of unstable, the
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:26, you wrote:
> However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versions
> (according to my tests and according to the code).
>
> Can somebody else confirm?
Confirmed. If I do a new install of unstable, the mail spool dir is clean.
pgpew6JqCacpj.pgp
Descript
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:57:04PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> Note: I still don't understand the Debian bug and can't reproduce it. I
> will look closer later.
I checked the code of 4.0.15-10.
The bug is present in this version.
However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versio
Tomasz,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I think I might have found the problem. The mail spool is open()ed, and
> then the fd is checked to see if there is an error (as is proper). The
> problem is, the fchown/fchmod calls happen in the same logic pa
Hey all,
I think I might have found the problem. The mail spool is open()ed, and
then the fd is checked to see if there is an error (as is proper). The
problem is, the fchown/fchmod calls happen in the same logic path as
error handling, not in an else block. The attached patch should fix it.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
