This one time, at band camp, Nicolas François said:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:18:44AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> >
> > The bug is present in 1:4.0.16-2. Unless I'm missing something?
>
> Well, the bug present in 1:4.0.16-2 is a little bit different:
> no mail spools are
package passwd
clone 374705 -1
retitle -1 useradd do not create the mail spool (even with
CREATE_MAIL_SPOOL=yes in /etc/default/useradd)
severity -1 normal
thanks
Hello Stephen,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:18:44AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> The bug is present in 1:4.0.16-2. Unless I'm miss
tags 374705 fixed-upstream
thanks
> Above is return so instead "else" can be placed by only "}".
> OK. I'll ASAP commit neccessary changes.
> Probaly in comming monday will be good release 4.0.17.
OK, so you will release with this fix. If that's completely sure, then
I think that I will not try
This one time, at band camp, Tomasz K??oczko said:
> Dnia 22-06-2006, czw o godzinie 11:18 +0100, Stephen Gran napisa??(a):
> [..]
> > The bug is present in 1:4.0.16-2. Unless I'm missing something?
>
> Please test patch from:
> http://cvs.pld.org.pl/shadow/src/useradd.c?r1=1.97&r2=1.99
[EMAIL P
Dnia 22-06-2006, czw o godzinie 11:18 +0100, Stephen Gran napisał(a):
[..]
> The bug is present in 1:4.0.16-2. Unless I'm missing something?
Please test patch from:
http://cvs.pld.org.pl/shadow/src/useradd.c?r1=1.97&r2=1.99
kloczek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
This one time, at band camp, Christian Perrier said:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:26, you wrote:
> > > However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versions
> > > (according to my tests and according to the code).
> > >
> > > Can somebody else
Dnia 21-06-2006, śro o godzinie 10:55 +0100, Stephen Gran napisał(a):
> --- src/useradd.c~ 2006-06-21 10:51:01.0 +0100
> +++ src/useradd.c 2006-06-21 10:51:17.0 +0100
> @@ -1599,6 +1599,7 @@
> if (fd < 0) {
> perror (_("Creating mai
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:26, you wrote:
> > However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versions
> > (according to my tests and according to the code).
> >
> > Can somebody else confirm?
>
> Confirmed. If I do a new install of unstable, the
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:26, you wrote:
> However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versions
> (according to my tests and according to the code).
>
> Can somebody else confirm?
Confirmed. If I do a new install of unstable, the mail spool dir is clean.
pgpew6JqCacpj.pgp
Descript
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:57:04PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> Note: I still don't understand the Debian bug and can't reproduce it. I
> will look closer later.
I checked the code of 4.0.15-10.
The bug is present in this version.
However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versio
Tomasz,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I think I might have found the problem. The mail spool is open()ed, and
> then the fd is checked to see if there is an error (as is proper). The
> problem is, the fchown/fchmod calls happen in the same logic pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
