-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Westby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm tempted to tag this wontfix, anyone object to that? Should we
> forward upstream first? I feel we know the arguments already, but
> they may just see it as an oversight and want to fix it. Opinions?
This made me wo
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm tempted to tag this wontfix, anyone object to that?
> Should we forward upstream first? I feel we know the
> arguments already, but they may just see it as an oversight
> and want to fix it. Opinions?
I'd say lets forward this bugs (#374662) to upstr
Hi all,
I'm tempted to tag this wontfix, anyone object to that?
Should we forward upstream first? I feel we know the
arguments already, but they may just see it as an oversight
and want to fix it. Opinions?
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar [Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:40:06 +0200]:
Hi,
> Package: bzr
> Version: 0.8.2-3
> Severity: minor
> bzr help commands lists bzr register-branch, but bzr(1) doesn't document
> it at all.
this is probably because the 'register-branch' command is not provided
by bzr itself, but by
Package: bzr
Version: 0.8.2-3
Severity: minor
bzr help commands lists bzr register-branch, but bzr(1) doesn't document
it at all.
--Jeroen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
5 matches
Mail list logo
