tags 374569 + etch-ignore
thanks
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060812 10:17]:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:45:35PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > One is to do nothing for now, and make an exception for the groff
> > licensing bug on the bases that (a) groff is nearly unusable for
> > autho
Hi Colin,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:45:35PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Proposals:
> I'm on holiday away from computers all next week, so I can't
> realistically do anything before the base freeze. I therefore have two
> proposals, either of which really ought to be signed off by the release
>
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 11:08:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:54:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On 20 Jun 2006, Colin Watson verbalised:
> > > It's dual-licensed upstream; I contacted upstream years ago about
> > > this issue (before it became particularly publ
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:54:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2006, Colin Watson verbalised:
> > It's dual-licensed upstream; I contacted upstream years ago about
> > this issue (before it became particularly public that Debian had a
> > problem with the licence) and arranged for th
On 20 Jun 2006, Colin Watson verbalised:
> It's dual-licensed upstream; I contacted upstream years ago about
> this issue (before it became particularly public that Debian had a
> problem with the licence) and arranged for the following statement
> to be added to the top-level LICENSES file:
>
> A
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:08:29PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> From /usr/share/doc/groff-base/copyright:
> ==
> Copyright (C) 1994-2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Permission is granted to copy,
Package: groff-base
Version: 1.18.1.1-12
Severity: serious
From /usr/share/doc/groff-base/copyright:
==
Copyright (C) 1994-2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/o
7 matches
Mail list logo
