Hi Lars,
> I am no expert on those tags to control the bug tracking system, but are you
> sure this worked? The bug still show up in jffnms and not snmpd.
This worked OK. The title still shows jffnms, but that's OK.
> Anyway -
> there are bugs in snmpd that's more than 4 years old, so I dou
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:15, Craig Small wrote:
> reassign 374065 snmpd
> severity 374065 normal
> tags 374065 +patch +pending
> merge 374065 363399
> thankyou
I am no expert on those tags to control the bug tracking system, but are you
sure this worked? The bug still show up in jffnms and not
reassign 374065 snmpd
severity 374065 normal
tags 374065 +patch +pending
merge 374065 363399
thankyou
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:51:10AM +0800, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
> But I'll be quite OK if this bug is reassigned to snmpd.
done.
> > SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::dod.0.0.0.0.
On Monday 19 June 2006 08:55, Craig Small wrote:
> > Latest version of jffnms in Debian is unable to detect Linux System and
> > CPU info when doing a manual scan. IF these interfaces have been
> Assuming it is the same problem I see here, it is not a bug in JFFNMS
> but a bug/feature? of snmpd
W
4 matches
Mail list logo
