On Thu, 05 Apr 2007, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:23:34 -0300, "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh"
> ...
> > However, it has been a difficult month, I don't think I will have time to
> > work on HPLIP for one more month except for security bugs, which is the
> > main
> > reason 1.7.x
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:23:34 -0300, "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh"
...
> However, it has been a difficult month, I don't think I will have time to
> work on HPLIP for one more month except for security bugs, which is the
> main
> reason 1.7.x has not been packaged for Sid yet.
Is there anything som
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007, W. Borgert wrote:
> Now, that 1.6.10 will be released with etch, will you consider
> splitting the package after release? I would very much
Yes, I will.
However, it has been a difficult month, I don't think I will have time to
work on HPLIP for one more month except for secu
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:17:44AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> This is not a "no". Ubuntu does such a split, and I may do it later, but it
> will not happen at least until HPLIP 1.x is good enough to migrate to Etch.
Now, that 1.6.10 will be released with etch, will you consider
s
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> hplip depends on python-qt3, which depends in turn on many packages not
> normally found on a bare file and print server. Assuming the upstream
> codebase allows it, could you provide an 'hplip-nogui' package?
Maybe. Such changes are more invasive than w
Package: hplip
Version: 0.9.7-4
Severity: wishlist
hplip depends on python-qt3, which depends in turn on many packages not
normally found on a bare file and print server. Assuming the upstream
codebase allows it, could you provide an 'hplip-nogui' package?
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
6 matches
Mail list logo
