On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 01:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I agree - if Manoj still wants to use this in kernel-package then it
> should be documented there, otherwise we can all stop using it and no
> documentation is needed.
So I guess this bug can be closed, if official kernel-images drop
kernel-
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:54 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:55:38PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
> > > change in the of
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:55:38PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
> > change in the official kernel packages, which has no bearing on custom
> > configurati
Hi Ben.
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
> change in the official kernel packages, which has no bearing on custom
> configurations.
What about adding a linux-common package? Ok... is probably annyoing ;)
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:44:57PM +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi Manoj, hi kernel team.
>
> May I suggest to put that manpage in the new linux-base package (and
> removing it from kernel-package)?
>
> In kernel-package generated kernel images would just have to depend on
> linux-bas
Hi Manoj, hi kernel team.
May I suggest to put that manpage in the new linux-base package (and
removing it from kernel-package)?
In kernel-package generated kernel images would just have to depend on
linux-base,... and so we could be sure, that everybody has that manpage.
btw: Isn't that necessa
6 matches
Mail list logo
