On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:25:58PM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> > JP == Justin Pryzby [2006-6-8]
>
> >> Beside "exit 1", which I understand and agree with, are you also
> >> suggesting to use $0 rather than ${0##*/}/auctex? If so, why?
> JP> Yes; because this is not auctex (right?).
> JP == Justin Pryzby [2006-6-8]
>> Beside "exit 1", which I understand and agree with, are you also
>> suggesting to use $0 rather than ${0##*/}/auctex? If so, why?
JP> Yes; because this is not auctex (right?).
Oh, my, but of course! :-) I will use ${0##*/}/preview-latex-style.
--
Thank
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:10:35PM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> tags 372146 + confirmed pending
> thanks
> > JP == Justin Pryzby [2006-6-8]
>
> JP> Package: preview-latex-style
> JP> Version: 11.82-1
> JP> Tags: patch
>
> JP> The prerm failed-upgrade case is called when upgrade fail
tags 372146 + confirmed pending
thanks
> JP == Justin Pryzby [2006-6-8]
JP> Package: preview-latex-style
JP> Version: 11.82-1
JP> Tags: patch
JP> The prerm failed-upgrade case is called when upgrade fails, as a
JP> second chance at the same thing, not as a rollback request.
You are right, t
Package: preview-latex-style
Version: 11.82-1
Tags: patch
The prerm failed-upgrade case is called when upgrade fails, as a
second chance at the same thing, not as a rollback request.
The other maintscripts need to have their *) messages fixed too.
--- /var/lib/dpkg/info/preview-latex-style.prerm
5 matches
Mail list logo
