Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing

2006-06-07 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Yaroslav Halchenko said: > Hi Stephen, > > Thank you for your feedback and sorry for the delay with my reply. You're welcome, and no problem, respectively. > > Second, I am assuming like all good scripts, this is set -e. So you > nope -- I removed set -e since > /e

Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing

2006-06-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.07.2020 +0200]: > > /etc/init.d/skeleton > > states: > > # Do NOT "set -e" > > since it would cause the script to fail on any failed call to > > function/command, which it shouldn't do but rath

Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing

2006-06-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Stephen, Thank you for your feedback and sorry for the delay with my reply. > Second, I am assuming like all good scripts, this is set -e. So you nope -- I removed set -e since /etc/init.d/skeleton states: # Do NOT "set -e" since it would cause the script to fail on any failed call to functi

Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing

2006-06-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.07.2020 +0200]: > /etc/init.d/skeleton > states: > # Do NOT "set -e" > since it would cause the script to fail on any failed call to > function/command, which it shouldn't do but rather process return value. This is horrible. > failingfu

Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing

2006-06-06 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said: > Package: fail2ban > Version: 0.6.1-3 > Severity: grave > Tags: patch > > --- /etc/init.d/fail2ban.orig 2006-06-06 16:30:22.760214786 +0200 > +++ /etc/init.d/fail2ban 2006-06-06 16:38:44.260607142 +0200 > @@ -60,8 +60,10 @@ > || return 1 >

Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing

2006-06-06 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.06.1712 +0200]: > is this reincarnation of #370256 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=370256 > reassigned to lsb-base > or pidofproc changed its API? Looks like it. Sorry I did not check the BTS carefully enough. And my m

Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing

2006-06-06 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
is this reincarnation of #370256 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=370256 reassigned to lsb-base or pidofproc changed its API? On Tue, 06 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote: > Package: fail2ban > Version: 0.6.1-3 > Severity: grave > Tags: patch > --- /etc/init.d/fail2ban.orig 2006-0

Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing

2006-06-06 Thread martin f krafft
Package: fail2ban Version: 0.6.1-3 Severity: grave Tags: patch --- /etc/init.d/fail2ban.orig 2006-06-06 16:30:22.760214786 +0200 +++ /etc/init.d/fail2ban 2006-06-06 16:38:44.260607142 +0200 @@ -60,8 +60,10 @@ || return 1 # we need to remove pid file or fail2ban would refuse to start # pro