Hi,
>> What prevents you to upload the updated version into unstable?
> The fact that the GNOME team will use which ever gtk+2.0 version they
> see fit in order not to break GNOME.
> Until the changes in gtk+2.0 version 2.8.18-3 do not reach unstable,
> we can't fix it.
Now that gtk 2.8.20 is i
Le vendredi 21 juillet 2006 à 15:37 +0200, Laurent Bonnaud a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> this bug is fixed in experimental. Thanks!
>
> What prevents you to upload the updated version into unstable?
This new version is incompatible with the former one. It will be soon
uploaded in unstable, but with a new
On 21/07/06, Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
this bug is fixed in experimental. Thanks!
What prevents you to upload the updated version into unstable?
The fact that the GNOME team will use which ever gtk+2.0 version they
see fit in order not to break GNOME.
Until the changes
Hi,
this bug is fixed in experimental. Thanks!
What prevents you to upload the updated version into unstable?
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
So could you please update libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev to depend on
libdirectfb-dev instead of libdirectfb-0.9-22-dev ?
GTKDFB 2.0.9 is tied to some DFB 0.9.22 functions that were removed in
DFB 0.9.24 (whose -dev package is libdirectfb-dev ), so i guess
depending from l
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev
Version: 2.0.9.2-14.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
installing libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev is not without trouble:
# apt-get install libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean t
6 matches
Mail list logo
