On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:01:17 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > This certainly doesn't match up with the information that's available
> > on their website, especially considering that 2.8.6 is their release
> > version, they're iterating new development r
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:01:17 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> This certainly doesn't match up with the information that's available
> on their website, especially considering that 2.8.6 is their release
> version, they're iterating new development releases every 3-6 months
> which will eventually be
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:11:23 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> > It's your decision, but are you sure that you want to take on the
> > repsonsibility of maintaining a development release of lynx throughout
> > a stable release cycle instead of the stable
Hi Don,
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:11:23 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> It's your decision, but are you sure that you want to take on the
> repsonsibility of maintaining a development release of lynx throughout
> a stable release cycle instead of the stable release of lynx?
Yes, it is not something l
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:55:42 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> > > Why is this "important"? It looks like a purely cosmetical question.
> > > (minor or wishlist.)
> >
> > Because it's something that should be resolved prior to release, and
> > probably s
Hi Don and Andreas,
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:55:42 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Why is this "important"? It looks like a purely cosmetical question.
> > (minor or wishlist.)
>
> Because it's something that should be resolved prior to release, and
> probably should even be RC. It certainly isn't
submitter 490265 !
reopen 490265
found 490265 2.8.7dev9-1.1
thanks
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2008-07-11 Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > clone 369386 -1
> > retitle -1 lynx-cur should be called lynx; ditch lynx transition package
> > severity -1 important
> > tha
On 2008-07-11 Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> clone 369386 -1
> retitle -1 lynx-cur should be called lynx; ditch lynx transition package
> severity -1 important
> thanks
Why is this "important"? It looks like a purely cosmetical question.
(minor or wishlist.)
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, And
clone 369386 -1
retitle -1 lynx-cur should be called lynx; ditch lynx transition package
severity -1 important
thanks
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> We end up with a dummy package lynx that depends on lynx-cur. (I think
> we should keep it permanently.) It should work correctly, lyn
tags 369386 patch
tags 481774 patch
tags 481778 patch
tags 474928 patch
tags 474926 patch
thanks
Hello,
I have prepared a NMU/patch for lynx-cur fixing the rc-issues wit
respect to configuration file handling and replacement of lynx:
lynx-cur (2.8.7dev9-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
