Bug#368792: script-not-executable false positives

2006-05-24 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Russ Allbery wrote: > > This has been discussed before and the general consensus that I recall > from previous discussions is that such scripts should either be marked > executable or have that line removed if they really can't be executed > independently. Limiting the check to /usr/bin can miss

Bug#368792: script-not-executable false positives

2006-05-24 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 1.23.21 > Severity: normal > > The check script-not-executable apparently thinks that everything that > starts with #! should be executable, which is far from true. A lot of, > say, python or php scripts are installed somewhere under /usr/shar

Bug#368792: script-not-executable false positives

2006-05-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: lintian > Version: 1.23.21 > Severity: normal > The check script-not-executable apparently thinks that everything that > starts with #! should be executable, which is far from true. A lot of, > say, python or php scripts are installed somew

Bug#368792: script-not-executable false positives

2006-05-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.21 Severity: normal The check script-not-executable apparently thinks that everything that starts with #! should be executable, which is far from true. A lot of, say, python or php scripts are installed somewhere under /usr/share and carry that #! for documentation