tags 368263 + upstream
retitle 368263 please add -mieee on Alpha
severity 368263 wishlist
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-23 02:00]:
> Ahh!!! Adding -mieee helps. So I guess all of this is because the
> gcc-snapshot package doesn't activate -mieee by default on Alpha as
>
* Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-21 09:49]:
> I can't see anything obviously wrong with the code. Is it possible
> for any of you to make a stand-alone testcase?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/minc/4.2/minc-1.4/testdir$ cat test.c
#include
int main() {
double dvalue = 0.0;
v
* Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-21 01:01]:
> What "other cases like these" show SIGFPE? What kinds of errors
> should one be looking for? I have to say that I'm more inclined to
> blame GCC, especially on non-i386, and especially its optimizer.
> Could you try building it on i386?
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> minc produces a floating point exception on Alpha when I compile it
> with a snapshot of GCC 4.2. I'm not entirely sure whether this is a
> compiler bug or one in your package, but from other cases like these
> it is likely that your package is doing
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 12:36:46AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> minc produces a floating point exception on Alpha when I compile
> it with a snapshot of GCC 4.2. I'm not entirely sure whether this is
> a compiler bug or one in your package, but from other cases like these
> it is likely that
Package: minc
Version: 1.4-4
minc produces a floating point exception on Alpha when I compile
it with a snapshot of GCC 4.2. I'm not entirely sure whether this is
a compiler bug or one in your package, but from other cases like these
it is likely that your package is doing something wrong and tha
6 matches
Mail list logo
