Bug#366741: patch

2006-08-26 Thread Frank S. Thomas
tags 366741 - patch thanks On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:33, Robert Millan wrote: > Or perhaps, since in Debian this is only useful for our amd64 port, it > could be enclosed in "#ifdef __x86_64__". See new patch. Patch applied in SVN. Thanks, Frank -- bureaucracy, n: A method for transforming e

Bug#366741: patch

2006-08-26 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 02:03:01PM +0200, Frank S. Thomas wrote: > On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:20, Robert Millan wrote: > > Ok, this is not what I would send upstream, but I think it's suitable for > > Debian. > > > > Normaly, when you modify in client_state.xml, boinc will > > notice the architec

Bug#366741: patch

2006-08-26 Thread Frank S. Thomas
On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:20, Robert Millan wrote: > Ok, this is not what I would send upstream, but I think it's suitable for > Debian. > > Normaly, when you modify in client_state.xml, boinc will > notice the architecture is different than the hardcoded platform_name in > the program, and rese

Bug#366741: patch

2006-08-20 Thread Robert Millan
tags 366741 patch thanks Ok, this is not what I would send upstream, but I think it's suitable for Debian. Normaly, when you modify in client_state.xml, boinc will notice the architecture is different than the hardcoded platform_name in the program, and reset the project to avoid incompatible ar

Bug#366741: patch

2006-08-20 Thread Robert Millan
Or perhaps, since in Debian this is only useful for our amd64 port, it could be enclosed in "#ifdef __x86_64__". See new patch. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. diff