tags 366741 - patch
thanks
On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:33, Robert Millan wrote:
> Or perhaps, since in Debian this is only useful for our amd64 port, it
> could be enclosed in "#ifdef __x86_64__". See new patch.
Patch applied in SVN.
Thanks,
Frank
--
bureaucracy, n: A method for transforming e
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 02:03:01PM +0200, Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:20, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Ok, this is not what I would send upstream, but I think it's suitable for
> > Debian.
> >
> > Normaly, when you modify in client_state.xml, boinc will
> > notice the architec
On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:20, Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok, this is not what I would send upstream, but I think it's suitable for
> Debian.
>
> Normaly, when you modify in client_state.xml, boinc will
> notice the architecture is different than the hardcoded platform_name in
> the program, and rese
tags 366741 patch
thanks
Ok, this is not what I would send upstream, but I think it's suitable for
Debian.
Normaly, when you modify in client_state.xml, boinc will notice
the architecture is different than the hardcoded platform_name in the program,
and reset the project to avoid incompatible ar
Or perhaps, since in Debian this is only useful for our amd64 port, it could be
enclosed in "#ifdef __x86_64__". See new patch.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
diff
5 matches
Mail list logo