Bug#366248: man_MANS without effect

2006-05-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Daniel Leidert wrote on Sat, May 06, 2006 at 05:13:27PM CEST: > Am Samstag, den 06.05.2006, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > > > > As a small example for what I tried: > > > > man_src = \ > > foo.1.xml \ > > bar.1.xml \ > > lib.3.cml > > > > man_MANS = $(patsubst %.xml,%,$(man

Bug#366248: man_MANS without effect

2006-05-06 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Samstag, den 06.05.2006, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > Am Samstag, den 06.05.2006, 16:52 +0200 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: > > * Daniel Leidert wrote on Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:26:06PM CEST: > > > Package: automake1.9 > > > Version: 1.9.6-4 > > > > > I may be wrong, but only using man_MANS

Bug#366248: man_MANS without effect

2006-05-06 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Samstag, den 06.05.2006, 16:52 +0200 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: > * Daniel Leidert wrote on Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:26:06PM CEST: > > Package: automake1.9 > > Version: 1.9.6-4 > > > I may be wrong, but only using man_MANS has no effect on the resulting > > Makefile. The related targets are not cr

Bug#366248: man_MANS without effect

2006-05-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Daniel, * Daniel Leidert wrote on Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:26:06PM CEST: > Package: automake1.9 > Version: 1.9.6-4 > I may be wrong, but only using man_MANS has no effect on the resulting > Makefile. The related targets are not created. When I instead use > > manx_MANS (x=0-9) > > the resulti

Bug#366248: man_MANS without effect

2006-05-06 Thread Daniel Leidert
Package: automake1.9 Version: 1.9.6-4 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I may be wrong, but only using man_MANS has no effect on the resulting Makefile. The related targets are not created. When I instead use manx_MANS (x=0-9) the resulting Makefile.in contains all