On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > 3. It ignores any patches with a . in their name - without even a
> >warning. (That's a "IMHO too strict".)
>
> That's exactly like run-parts behave, so that's not really inconsistent.
> Unlikely to be changed at this point I think.
Indeed and
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:50:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I found a couple of things where dpkg-source 2.0 is too strict:
>
> 1. it refuses if a patch starts with "diff -Nur " as comment. Fix:
>add a "or /^diff /", so that the check line looks like:
> while (defined($_ = ) &
Package: dpkg-source
Version: 1.13.18
Hi,
I found a couple of things where dpkg-source 2.0 is too strict:
1. it refuses if a patch starts with "diff -Nur " as comment. Fix:
add a "or /^diff /", so that the check line looks like:
while (defined($_ = ) && !(/^--- / or /^Index:/ or /
3 matches
Mail list logo
