On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 01:52:16PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:11:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:50:54PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Thirdly, it's completely wrong anyway.
> >
> > Please provide your own fix. It makes more than half
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:11:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:50:54PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Thirdly, it's completely wrong anyway.
>
> Please provide your own fix. It makes more than half of the builds on
> the buildd fail and I consider it as an NMU reason w
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:50:54PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Thirdly, it's completely wrong anyway.
Please provide your own fix. It makes more than half of the builds on
the buildd fail and I consider it as an NMU reason without more time to
wait according to developers reference 5.10.2.2.
Bas
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:50:54PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Firstly, you forgot to attach the second patch. Secondly, if people are
> still insisting that no X server (including Xephyr, Xvfb, Xorg dummy) should
> be built on S/390, then it's completely wrong.
Noone asked the s390 people and I
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:04:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The attached patch is one possible fix. The second makes the include
> non-failing.
Firstly, you forgot to attach the second patch. Secondly, if people are
still insisting that no X server (including Xephyr, Xvfb, Xorg dummy) should
tags 361908 patch
thanks
The attached patch is one possible fix. The second makes the include
non-failing.
Bastian
--
You're dead, Jim.
-- McCoy, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7
diff -urN xorg-7.0.10/debian/changelog xorg-7.0.10.0.1/debian/changelog
--- xorg-7.0.10/debian/changelog
6 matches
Mail list logo
