Hi *,
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:29:51AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >If this file is a non-copyrightable interface definition, the bug here is
> >the presence of a copyright notice and license statement where there
> >should be none.
>
> ITS#4693 in the OpenLDAP ITS system.
In the logs
severity 361846 serious
tags 361846 etch-ignore
thanks
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:51:52AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Plus, this is an interface specification if I've ever seen one, and
> >> interface specifications are not copyrightable under US l
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Plus, this is an interface specification if I've ever seen one, and
>> interface specifications are not copyrightable under US law.
> I agree, but was hesitant to assert this without some corroboration.
> If this file is a non-copyrightable interface
> As a philosophical point - in the United States, every written work is
> automatically covered by copyright at the moment of creation.
This is factually false. Recipes cannot be copyrighted, nor can interface
specifications, nor can telephone books, except to the degree that a
compilation copyr
--On Tuesday, October 03, 2006 1:24 PM -0700 Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this file is a non-copyrightable interface definition, the bug here
is the presence of a copyright notice and
Quanah Gibson-Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If this file is a non-copyrightable interface definition, the bug here
>> is the presence of a copyright notice and license statement where there
>> should be none.
> ITS#4693 in the OpenLDAP ITS system
--On Monday, October 02, 2006 9:14 PM -0700 Steve Langasek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
severity 361846 important
retitle 361846 invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema
thanks
Plus, this is an interface specification if I've ever seen one, and
interface specifications are n
severity 361846 important
retitle 361846 invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema
thanks
> Plus, this is an interface specification if I've ever seen one, and
> interface specifications are not copyrightable under US law.
I agree, but was hesitant to assert this without some corr
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 09:19:31PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 08:16:46PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> > > The ftpmasters have recently rejected a package that contains another
> > > schema file with identical license text, and there was no obvious
> > > opposition to t
Am Montag, den 10.04.2006, 21:19 +0200 schrieb Torsten Landschoff:
> > > The ftpmasters have recently rejected a package that contains another
> > > schema file with identical license text, and there was no obvious
> > > opposition to that decision on Debian legal [0], so the current
> > > underst
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 08:16:46PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> > The ftpmasters have recently rejected a package that contains another
> > schema file with identical license text, and there was no obvious
> > opposition to that decision on Debian legal [0], so the current
> > understanding seems to
Am Montag, den 10.04.2006, 19:39 +0200 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> The ftpmasters have recently rejected a package that contains another
> schema file with identical license text, and there was no obvious
> opposition to that decision on Debian legal [0], so the current
> understanding seems to be
Package: openldap2.2
Severity: serious
The license for the file core.schema says:
## Portions Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1997-2003).
## All Rights Reserved.
##
## This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
## others, and derivative works that comment on or otherw
13 matches
Mail list logo
