On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > I probably need to understand how mail gets into the system
> > > better before I can see how to prepare the bounce handler.
> >
> > That's easy to check. Login in master and check
> > /org/packages.qa.debian.org/mail/.
>
> I don't understand how that coul
tag 359905 + patch
stop
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > The best solution would be be to implement the bounce handler (with
> > > VERP-like headers) but an intermediary solution would be to extract the
> > > unsubscription code into a stand-alone perl script that I can call on
> > > mast
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I recall you insisting that false positives were not a serious problem
> with spam detection systems.
>
> I'm glad you now disagree with your previous position.
I'm pretty sure you're mistaken. For example, "Any false-positive
listing and you bounce valid
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They have an attacker-specified subject line and can be loaded
> with content after the stop command, to trigger spam traps.
> If you expect users to flag up these messages, how can they
> spot them?
I recall you insisting that false positives were not a serio
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> > I'll include a patch which changes the subject to "Unsubscription notice"
> > or something similar.
>
> You'll prepare it, or accept it when it arrives?
Accept it if it arrives. :-)
> > The best solution would be be to implement the bounce handler (with
> >
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Several persons complained of the *risk* but you're the first one who
> tells us that he has been unsubscribed by someone with malicious intent.
I have no way of telling whether or not I was, as I didn't notice
soon enough to check the logs. I hope it's more l
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Because I believe it's not a bug but a feature. It can even help to be
> > able to unsubscribe someone else who has troubles unsubscribing alone.
>
> Respectfully, I disagree. This bug is making the PTS
> unreliable for co-maintainers.
Several persons compla
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> > In any case, why was the bug marked done if it's known,
> > but won't be fixed?
>
> Because I believe it's not a bug but a feature. It can even help to be
> able to unsubscribe someone else who has troubles unsubscribing
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> Thank you for the information. I must have not seen it because
> it didn't say PTS or package in its title.
>
> I disagree with the justification. The one and only notice
> email can be missed easily and unsubscription is a pain.
> Please can this be fixed?
>
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is briefly discussed and justified at:
>
> #339724: unsubscribing to bug reports from web page open to malicious use
> Package: qa.debian.org; Reported by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tags: pts
> Done: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Will be archived in 11 days
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:18:34PM +0100, MJ Ray (Debian) wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: important
>
> Recently, I stopped receiving bug information via the PTS for
> rsnapshot (with various consequences including an NMU). I
> found nothing relevant in the PTS log files but I did see
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
Recently, I stopped receiving bug information via the PTS for
rsnapshot (with various consequences including an NMU). I
found nothing relevant in the PTS log files but I did see
PTS mail was sent to several of my different email addresses.
When tidying m
12 matches
Mail list logo
