Good idea! I'll try to do that.
Nicholas J Humfrey wrote:
> Could you include the oRTP library version number in the package
> description then?
>
> "This package provides version 0.12.0 of oRTP"
>
> Should be scriptable. The version number is contained in configure.ac
> and output to ortp.pc (a
Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> Can you please still use the oRTP library version number, instead of the
>> linphone version number?
>
> Unfortunately not, the version number has to be the same for the whole
> package.
Nope. You can force the version of a binary package, look at
Could you include the oRTP library version number in the package
description then?
"This package provides version 0.12.0 of oRTP"
Should be scriptable. The version number is contained in configure.ac
and output to ortp.pc (and several other files).
nick.
On 8 Mar 2007, at 21:17, Samuel M
Hi,
Nicholas J Humfrey wrote:
> Can you please still use the oRTP library version number, instead of the
> linphone version number?
Unfortunately not, the version number has to be the same for the whole
package.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Can you please still use the oRTP library version number, instead of
the linphone version number?
It is very confusing. It took some digging to discover that version
0.12.0 of oRTP is contained in libortp5_1.5.1-1_i386.deb
http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/linphone/ortp/sources/
5 matches
Mail list logo
