Brad Sawatzky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> There's only one node created under /dev/bus/usb unfortunately, that's
>> a real problem with multifunction devices and the current permissions
>> scheme - it's hard to share the printer between CUPS and SANE.
>
> This is what was in the back of my
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Brad Sawatzky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ... ]
> > Is it possible for the autoprobed scanner device to be indeterminate? The
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, could you elaborate ?
See below.
> > CX6600 is a multifunction printer/scanner unit
Brad Sawatzky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> Can you unplug your scanner, run udevmonitor (as root), plug it in and
>> send me the output ?
>
> Alright. Now I'm confused...
>
> The scanner now works correctly with the original rule:
>SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> and
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Brad Sawatzky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Changing the line to
> > SUBSYSTEM!="usb_endpoint", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> > allows the rule to match and fixes the problem for me.
> >
> > I assume that this is a change in how kernel 2.6.20.7 report
Brad Sawatzky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Changing the line to
> SUBSYSTEM!="usb_endpoint", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> allows the rule to match and fixes the problem for me.
>
> I assume that this is a change in how kernel 2.6.20.7 reports this device?
> I've attached a udevinfo dump for t
Package: libsane
Version: 1.0.18-6
Followup-For: Bug #359797
The patch suggested by Henrique causes libsane.rules to fail to match my
scanner (an Epson CX6600). The problem is that udev sees a subsystem class
of "usb_endpoint" not "usb_device" so the following line causes the bulk of
libsane.rule
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> You need to write it like this:
> ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
Fixed upstream.
Thanks,
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pu
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And still, it works.
>
> As in it matches a lot many more times than it should, wasting resources.
Ah, ok, so it's not b0rken, it's just sub-optimal.
Fix queued, thanks.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PR
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The first line of the udev rules file is incorrect:
> > SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> >
> > You need to write it like this:
> > ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_ru
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first line of the udev rules file is incorrect:
> SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
>
> You need to write it like this:
> ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rul
Package: libsane
Version: 1.0.17-1
Severity: normal
The first line of the udev rules file is incorrect:
SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
You need to write it like this:
ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
As ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
