On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
putting the submitter back in the loop.
Thomas Dickey (10/11/2006):
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:00:11AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hi,
By doing this (putting a mail-like > in front of U+2218), you're making
vim output U+2218 in bold font (b
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 28 Feb 2011 01:42:54 +0100, a écrit :
> Thomas Dickey (10/11/2006):
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:00:11AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > By doing this (putting a mail-like > in front of U+2218), you're making
> > > vim output U+2218 in bold font (beca
Hi,
putting the submitter back in the loop.
Thomas Dickey (10/11/2006):
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:00:11AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > By doing this (putting a mail-like > in front of U+2218), you're making
> > vim output U+2218 in bold font (because the mail syntax expresse
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:00:11AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By doing this (putting a mail-like > in front of U+2218), you're making
> vim output U+2218 in bold font (because the mail syntax expresses a
> color that result into bold font in your vim configuration). Then xterm
> has t
Hi,
By doing this (putting a mail-like > in front of U+2218), you're making
vim output U+2218 in bold font (because the mail syntax expresses a
color that result into bold font in your vim configuration). Then xterm
has to draw a bold U+2218. The problem is that for this you need a bold
font that
Package: xterm
Version: 210-2
Severity: minor
Unicode characters generally render properly in my xterm, using
LANG=en_US.UTF-8, however I just noticed a glitch. When U+2218 is
rendered in some colors, it turns into the dashed box that usually
denotes a bad character. To reproduce:
- start vim i
6 matches
Mail list logo
