tags 358668 + patch fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-24 00:58]:
>> > s/crates/creates/
>> > s/debootstrap/cdebootstrap/
>>
>> Is there any good reason we don't use the official debootstrap?
>
> Yeah, I think
* Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-25 12:49]:
> I used cdebootstrap after some IRC discussion on #d-d about which was
> most up-to-date and maintained, and the general concensus was that
> cdebootstrap was the way to go.
>
> If this is incorrect
It was probably correct at the time you had
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-24 00:58]:
>> > s/crates/creates/
>> > s/debootstrap/cdebootstrap/
>>
>> Is there any good reason we don't use the official debootstrap?
>
> Yeah, I think I later tried to ask rleigh on irc but he wasn't a
* Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-24 00:58]:
> > s/crates/creates/
> > s/debootstrap/cdebootstrap/
>
> Is there any good reason we don't use the official debootstrap?
Yeah, I think I later tried to ask rleigh on irc but he wasn't around.
I think all reasons for cdebootstrap went away
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:03:01PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> | buildd.chroot (Sarge Edition)
> | =
>
> | This script crates the chroot environment for sbuild. It's written
> | on the basis of current debootstrap --variant=buildd option by
>
> s/crates/creates/
>
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.37
Severity: minor
| buildd.chroot (Sarge Edition)
| =
| This script crates the chroot environment for sbuild. It's written
| on the basis of current debootstrap --variant=buildd option by
s/crates/creates/
s/debootstrap/cdebootstrap/
And w
6 matches
Mail list logo
